LIKAMBO YA MABELE

Hiro-Hito a écrit:
Mon cher
Il y a un autre convoi en route, la Turquie veut envoyer ses navires de guerre pour l'accompagner, Israel pe a lobi, il les attends de pieds ferme car c une declaration de guerre. q font les gens plein de compassion?

Troll a écrit: www.laliberation.fr
Bombe.. atomique

Le journal La Libération du 04 juin 2010 publié en France..et pas en Suéde On trouve des bonnes informations sur la bombe atomique Israelienne..

1954

Debut du programme nucléaire Israelienne avec l´aide de la France..

1963

La cooperation avec la France cesse et les USA apportent son aide.

1979

Les USA aident Israel a fabriquer la bombe H..et Israel coopere avec l´Afrique du Sud où Tshal va faire quelque essaie

On va encore accuser Troll d´inventer des histoires..mais un peu de lecture et de recherche peut aider les intervenants

The United States first became aware of Dimona's existence after U-2 overflights in 1958 captured the facility's construction, but it was not identified as a nuclear site until two years later. The complex was variously explained as a textile plant, an agricultural station, and a metallurgical research facility, until David Ben-Gurion stated in December 1960 that Dimona complex was a nuclear research center built for "peaceful purposes."
There followed two decades in which the United States, through a combination of benign neglect, erroneous analysis, and successful Israeli deception, failed to discern first the details of Israel's nuclear program. As early as 8 December 1960, the CIA issued a report outlining Dimona's implications for nuclear proliferation, and the CIA station in Tel Aviv had determined by the mid-1960s that the Israeli nuclear weapons program was an established and irreversible fact.
United States inspectors visited Dimona seven times during the 1960s, but they were unable to obtain an accurate picture of the activities carried out there, largely due to tight Israeli control over the timing and agenda of the visits. The Israelis went so far as to install false control room panels and to brick over elevators and hallways that accessed certain areas of the facility. The inspectors were able to report that there was no clear scientific research or civilian nuclear power program justifying such a large reactor - circumstantial evidence of the Israeli bomb program - but found no evidence of "weapons related activities" such as the existence of a plutonium reprocessing plant.
:
:
:
Nuclear Weapons Production
In early 1968, the CIA issued a report concluding that Israel had successfully started production of nuclear weapons. This estimate, however, was based on an informal conversation between Carl Duckett, head of the CIA's Office of Science and Technology, and Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb. Teller said that, based on conversations with friends in the Israeli scientific and defense establishment, he had concluded that Israel was capable of building the bomb, and that the CIA should not wait for an Israeli test to make a final assessment because that test would never be carried out.
CIA estimates of the Israeli arsenal's size did not improve with time. In 1974, Duckett estimated that Israel had between ten and twenty nuclear weapons. The upper bound was derived from CIA speculation regarding the number of possible Israeli targets, and not from any specific intelligence. Because this target list was presumed to be relatively static, this remained the official American estimate until the early 1980s.

Troll a écrit:

Sauf que mr Hiro Hito oublie que ce navire battant pavilon est un TERRITOIRE TURQUE que Tsahal ne peut pas "penetrer" surtout dans les eaux internationales

Ko zanga ko yeba.. Quelle est la difference entre les pirates somaliens et ce raid de Tsahal ..


Que pensez-vous de l´information du www.lesoir.be On dirait que vous allez pleurer quand Israel va lever le blocus sur Gaza et va autoriser les navires des humanitaires á accoster á Gaza

SECTION V : NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFT
Neutral merchant vessels
67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:
(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;
(e) sail under convoy of enemy warships or military aircraft; or
(f) otherwise make an effective contribution to the enemy s military action, e.g., by carrying military materials, and it is not feasible for the attacking forces to first place passengers and crew in a place of safety. Unless circumstances do not permit, they are to be given a warning, so that they can re-route, off-load, or take other precautions.